

FOLLOWUS
1. a College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Nanjing University of Aeronautics Nanjing China
2. c JITRI Institute of Precision Manufacturing
3. a College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Nanjing University of Aeronautics
4. b College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Nanjing Forestry University
Online First:05 January 2023,
Published:2022
Scan QR Code
Ning Qian, Fan Jiang, Jiajia Chen, et al. Heat transfer enhancement by diamond nanofluid in gravity heat pipe for waste heat recovery[J]. Functional Diamond2022, 2(1): 236-244.
Ning Qian, Fan Jiang, Jiajia Chen, et al. Heat transfer enhancement by diamond nanofluid in gravity heat pipe for waste heat recovery[J]. Functional Diamond2022, 2(1): 236-244. DOI: 10.1080/26941112.2022.2163594.
Waste heat recovery is significant for improving energy utilization
reducing carbon emissions
and neutrality. The gravity heat pipe (GHP) has excellent thermal performance due to the cyclic phase transformation of the working fluid. As an important thermal management device for waste heat recovery
the heat transport capacity of GHP improves
the efficiency and performance of the waste heat recovery increase
and more wasted heat can be stored more quickly. Nano-diamond has the highest thermal conductivity and can be dispersed in water to form a diamond nanofluid
enhancing the thermal performance of GHP. In contrast
the study on the heat transfer behavior of the diamond nanofluid in GHP is insufficient. Besides
the influences of filling ratio (FR)
mass fraction (MF)
and heat flux on thermal performance are in demand for further study. In this article
the heat transfer behavior is investigated by studying the flow patterns of diamond nanofluids. The influences of filling ratio and mass fraction on flow patterns are analyzed. An orthogonal experiment is conducted; the heat flux has the most significant effect on the thermal performance
followed by t
he filling ratio and mass fraction. The thermal performance is the best when the optimal parameters (FR = 20%
MF = 1 w.t.%) are selected under a heat flux of 20 × 10
4
W/m
2
. The equivalent heat transfer coefficient reaches 3485 W/(m
2
·°C). This article can achieve a deeper understanding of the diamond nanofluid heat transfer mechanism in GHP and enhance the thermal performance of GHP for better waste heat recovery.
Olabi AG, Elsaid K, Rabaia MKH, et al. Waste heat-driven desalination systems: perspective. Energy. 2020;209:118373. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Mahmoudi A, Fazli M, Morad MR. A recent review of waste heat recovery by organic rankine cycle. Appl Therm Eng. 2018;143:660–675. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Olabi AG, Abdelkareem MA. Renewable energy and climate change. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;158:112111. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Jouhara H, Sayegh MA. Energy efficient thermal systems and processes. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2018;7:e1–2–e2. Google Scholar
Olabi AG, Obaideen K, Elsaid K, et al. Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;153:111710. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tabbi W, Olabi AG, Imran M, et al. Recovery of waste heat from proton exchange membrane fuel cells – a review. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.069 Google Scholar
Yang P, Peng S, Benani N, et al. An integrated evaluation on china’s provincial carbon peak and carbon neutrality. J Clean Prod. 2022;377:134497. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Reay D, Harvey A. The role of heat pipes in intensified unit operations. Appl Therm Eng. 2013;57(1–2):147–153. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hassan MI, Alzarooni IA, Shatilla Y. The effect of water-based nanofluid incorporating Al2O3 nanoparticles on heat pipe performance. Energy Procedia. 2015;75:3201–3206. Google Scholar
Zhang T, Cai J, Wang L, et al. Comparative and sensitive analysis on the filling, operating and performance patterns between the solar gravity heat pipe and the traditional gravity heat pipe. Energy. 2022;238:121950. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Amir F. Heat pipes: review, opportunities and challenges. Front Heat Pipes. 2014;5(1):1–48. Google Scholar
Kim JS, Kim Y, Shin DH, et al. Heat transfer and flow visualization of a two-phase closed thermosiphon using water, acetone, and HFE7100. Appl Therm Eng. 2021;187:116571. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Abdelkareem MA, Maghrabie HM, Sayed ET, et al. Heat pipe-based waste heat recovery systems: background and applications. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2022;29:101221. Google Scholar
Ma H, Du N, Zhang Z, et al. Assessment of the optimum operation conditions on a heat pipe heat exchanger for waste heat recovery in steel industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;79:50–60. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Jouhara H, Bertrand D, Axcell B, et al. Investigation on a full-scale heat pipe heat exchanger in the ceramics industry for waste heat recovery. Energy. 2021;223:120037. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ramkumar P, Sivasubramanian M, Raveendiran P, et al. An experimental inquisition of waste heat recovery in electronic component system using concentric tube heat pipe heat exchanger with different working fluids under gravity assistance. Microprocess Microsyst. 2021;83:104033. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Chen J, Huang W, Cen J, et al. Heat extraction from hot dry rock by super-long gravity heat pipe: selection of working fluid. Energy. 2022;255:124531. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Gedik E, Yilmaz M, Kurt H. Experimental investigation on the thermal performance of heat recovery system with gravity assisted heat pipe charged with R134a and R410A. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;99:334–342. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Savino R, Abe Y, Fortezza R. Comparative study of heat pipes with different working fluids under normal gravity and microgravity conditions. Acta Astronaut. 2008;63(1–4):24–34. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Nazari MA, Ahmadi MH, Sadeghzadeh M, et al. A review on application of nanofluid in various types of heat pipes. J Cent South Univ. 2019;26(5):1021–1041. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Yilmaz Aydin D, Gürü M, Sözen A, et al. Investigation of the effects of base fluid type of the nanofluid on heat pipe performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy. 2021;235(1):124–138. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Borode AO, Ahmed NA, Olubambi PA. A review of heat transfer application of carbon-based nanofluid in heat exchangers. Nano-Struc Nano-Obj. 2019;20:100394. Google Scholar
Khanlari A, Yılmaz Aydın D, Sözen A, et al. Investigation of the influences of kaolin-deionized water nanofluid on the thermal behavior of concentric type heat exchanger. Heat Mass Transfer. 2020;56(5):1453–1462. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Alawi OA, Sidik NAC, Mohammed HA, et al. Fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids in heat pipes: a review. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2014;56:50–62. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sang L. Diamond as the heat spreader for the thermal dissipation of GaN-based electronic devices. Funct Diam. 2021;1(1):174–188. Google Scholar
Alshayji A, Asadi A, Alarifi IM. On the heat transfer effectiveness and pumping power assessment of a diamond-water nanofluid based on thermophysical properties: an experimental study. Powder Technol. 2020;373:397–410. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Aydın DY, Aydin E, Gürü M. The effects of particle mass fraction and static magnetic field on the thermal performance of NiFe2O4 nanofluid in a heat pipe. Int J Therm Sci. 2023;183:107875. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sundar LS, Shaik F. Heat transfer and exergy efficiency analysis of 60% water and 40% ethylene glycol mixture diamond nanofluids flow through a shell and helical coil heat exchanger. Int J Therm Sci. 2023;184:107901. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Chen J, Cen J, Huang W, et al. Multiphase flow and heat transfer characteristics of an extra-long gravity-assisted heat pipe: an experimental study. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2021;164:120564. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Xuan Y, Li Q, Tie P. The effect of surfactants on heat transfer feature of nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2013;46:259–262. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ma H, He B, Su L, et al. Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluid flow at the entry region of microtubes. Int J Therm Sci. 2023;184:107944. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Liao M, Jin R, Ren H, et al. Orthogonal experimental design for the optimization of four additives in a model liquid infant formula to improve its thermal stability. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2022;163:113495. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kang P, Zhao Q, Guo S, et al. Optimisation of the spark plasma sintering process for high volume fraction SiCp/Al composites by orthogonal experimental design. Ceram Int. 2021;47(3):3816–3825. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Li J, Yang F, Zhang H, et al. Comparative analysis of different valve timing control methods for single-piston free piston expander-linear generator via an orthogonal experimental design. Energy. 2020;195:116966. Web of Science ®Google Scholar
0
Views
0
Downloads
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621